In his book Undeniable: Evolution and the Science of Creation, he claims, “ Creationism Bill Nye's book Undeniable is a perfect example. Bill Nye pt. pdf. Read Undeniable by Bill Nye for free with a 30 day free trial. Read unlimited* books and audiobooks on the web, iPad, iPhone and Android. Editorial Reviews. Review. “With his charming, breezy, narrative style, Bill empowers the reader Undeniable: Evolution and the Science of Creation - site edition by Bill Nye, Corey S. Powell. Download it once and read it on your site.
|Language:||English, German, Arabic|
|Genre:||Children & Youth|
|ePub File Size:||17.69 MB|
|PDF File Size:||19.78 MB|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Register to download]|
Description The New York Times best seller by the host of Bill Nye the Science Guy, with a brand new chapter for the paperback edition!. Read Undeniable: Evolution and the Science of Creation PDF Ebook by Bill Nye. Wimpy Steve Minecraft Diary Books for Kids, ePUB. Undeniable PDF Free Download. Undeniable: Evolution and the Science of Creation Audible – Unabridged ridged. Author: Bill Nye ID.
Where did they come from? Where did the flowers come from? Come to think of it, how did any of us get here?
I was getting pulled into something much larger than myself. The yearning to know about nature and where or how we fit in is deep within all of us. As I learned about evolution and descent by natural selection, the answers fell into place. We are all aware that evolution happens, because we all have parents. Many of us have, or will have, children.
We see the effects of heredity up close and personal. Think about the food grown on farms. For about twelve thousand years, exploiting the phenomenon of evolution, humans have been able to modify plants through a process known as artificial selection. In wheat farming and horse racing we call it breeding. Darwin realized that breeding and domesticating plants and animals involves exactly the same process that occurs naturally in evolution, only accelerated with the help of humans.
This natural process produced you and me. Once you become aware—once you see how evolution works—so many familiar aspects of the world take on new significance. The affectionate nuzzling of a dog, the annoying bite of a mosquito, the annual flu shot: All are direct consequences of evolution.
As you read this book, I hope you will also come away with a deeper appreciation for the universe and our place within it. We are the results of billions of years of cosmic events that led to the cozy, habitable planet we live on.
We experience evolution every day in our culture as well. People everywhere are fascinated with other people. We interact to produce more of us for future generations. People are fascinated with their bodies. Turn on the television to any channel. None of these products would be produced were we not walking, talking products of evolution.
We are all so much alike, because we are all human. But it goes deeper than that. We are all descended from a common ancestor.
We are shaped by the same forces and factors that influence every other living thing, and yet we emerged as something unique. Among the estimated 16 million species on Earth, we alone have the ability to comprehend the process that brought us here.
Any way you reckon it, evolution is inspiring. Despite all of that, a great number of people in many parts of the world—even in well-educated parts of the developed world—are resistant or hostile to the idea of evolution. Even in places like Pennsylvania and Kentucky, here in the United States, the whole idea of evolution is overwhelming, confusing, frightening, and even threatening to many individuals.
I can understand why. Many people who are troubled by evolution want to suppress teaching the whole concept of descent through natural selection in schools.
Others try to push it aside or dilute it by casting doubt on the established science that supports it. State education standards allow the teaching of fictitious alternatives to evolution in Texas, Louisiana, and Tennessee. What happens to other species also happens to us. I continually remind people what is at stake here. Our understanding of evolution came to us by exactly the same method of scientific discovery that led to printing presses, polio vaccines, and smartphones. Just as mass and motion are fundamental ideas in physics, and the movement of tectonic plates is a fundamental idea in geology, evolution is the fundamental idea in all of life science.
Evolution has essential practical applications in agriculture, environmental protection, medicine, and public health. What would the deniers have us do? Ignore all the scientific discoveries that make our technologically driven world possible, things like the ability to rotate crops, pump water, generate electricity, and broadcast baseball? Even the theological objections to evolution stand on shaky ground.
download for others
At the same time, many people around the world who hold deep religious convictions see no conflict between their spiritual beliefs and their scientific understanding of evolution.
So the naysayers are not only casting doubt on science and nonbelievers; they are also ignoring the billions of non-conflicted believers around the world, dismissing their views as unworthy.
It transforms our relationship to the life around us. Instead of being outsiders watching the natural world go by, we are insiders.
We are part of the process; we are the exquisite result of billions of years of natural research and development.
Frankly, my concern is not so much for the deniers of evolution as it is for their kids. We cannot address the problems facing humankind today without science—both the body of scientific knowledge and, more important, the process. Science is the way in which we know nature and our place within it.
Like any useful scientific theory, evolution enables us to make predictions about what we observe in nature. Some of the most wonderful aspects and consequences of evolution have been discovered only recently. This is in stark contrast to creationism, which offers a static view of the world, one that cannot be challenged or tested with reason. And because it cannot make predictions, it cannot lead to new discoveries, new medicines, or new ways to feed all of us.
Evolutionary theory takes us into the future. As the foundation of biology, evolution informs big questions about emerging agricultural and medical technologies. Should we genetically modify more of our foods? Should we pursue cloning and genetic engineering to improve human health? There is no way to make sense of these issues outside of an evolutionary context.
As an engineer trained in the U. I feel strongly that we need the young people of today to become the scientists and the engineers of tomorrow so that my native United States continues to be a world leader in discovery and innovation. If we suppress science in this country, we are headed for trouble.
Evolutionary theory also takes us into the past, offering a compelling case study of the collaborative and cumulative way that great scientific discoveries are made. In some sense the concept of evolution can be traced to the Greek philosopher Anaximander. In the sixth century BC, after evaluating fossils, he speculated that life had begun with fishlike animals living in the ocean.
He had no theory of how one species gave rise to another, however, nor did he have an explanation of how Earth acquired its stunning biodiversity. Nobody would, for another two millennia. Ultimately, the mechanism of evolution was discovered by two men at very nearly the same time: Charles Darwin and Alfred Wallace.
You may not have heard so much about Wallace. He was a naturalist who spent a great deal of time in the field studying and collecting specimens of flora and fauna.
He traveled in the site River basin and in what is now Malaysia. Through his far-flung geographic and intellectual explorations, Wallace formulated his theory of evolution independent of Darwin, and described an important aspect of the evolutionary process, often still referred to as the Wallace effect more about that in chapter Wallace recognized humans as just one part of a much broader living world.
Quoting from his book The Malay Archipelago , … trees and fruits, no less than the varied productions of the animal kingdom, do not appear to be organized with the exclusive reference to the use and convenience of man… In Victorian England, such a point of view was controversial to say the least. Darwin had the earlier start.
Undeniable: Evolution and the Science of Creation
Wallace was just eight years old in when the twenty-two-year-old Darwin had a remarkable opportunity as an energetic young man to go to sea aboard the HMS Beagle. He realized that if humans could turn wolves into dogs, then new species could come into existence by the same means naturally.
He also saw that populations do not grow and grow indefinitely, because their environment will always have limits on the resources available. Darwin connected these ideas by observing that living things produce more offspring than can survive. The individuals compete for resources in their respective ecosystems, and the individuals that are born or sprout with favorable variations have a better shot at survival than their siblings.
He realized that, left unchecked, the process of natural selection would result in the great diversity of living things that he would go on to observe. The paper was based on a letter that Wallace had written to Darwin, along with an abstract for a paper that Darwin had written in The revolutionary impact of the joint presentation was not immediately obvious to all of those in attendance.
Thomas Bell, the president of the Linnaean Society, infamously reported that no important scientific breakthroughs had occurred that year: The year which has passed has not, indeed, been marked by any of those striking discoveries which at once revolutionize, so to speak, the department of science on which they bear…. The publication of On the Origin of Species in created a sensation and proved President Bell spectacularly wrong.
It also made Darwin far more famous than Wallace, as Darwin remains to this day. His ability to articulate the theory of evolution is still astonishing. On the Origin of Species remains a remarkable and remarkably readable book, readily available in hardback, paperback, and online a century and a half later. In it, Darwin gives us example after example of evolution and explains the means by which it happens, providing both the facts and the mechanism in one volume.
Evolution is one of the most powerful and important ideas ever developed in the history of science. It describes all of life on Earth.
It describes any system in which things compete with each other for resources, whether those things are microbes in your body, trees in a rain forest, or even software programs in a computer. It is also the most reasonable creation story that humans have ever found. When religions disagree about just creation, there is nothing to do but argue.
When two scientists disagree about evolution, they confer with colleagues, develop theories, collect evidence, and arrive at a more complete understanding. Every question leads to new answers, new discoveries, and new smarter questions. Evolution goes a long way toward answering the universal question that ran through my brain as a kid, and still does: Where did we come from?
It also leads right into the companion question we all ask: Are we alone in the universe? Today, astronomers are finding planets rotating around distant stars, planets that might have the right conditions for supporting life.
Our robots are prospecting on Mars looking for signs of water and life. When we go seeking life elsewhere, the whole idea of what to look for, and where to look for it, will be guided by our understanding of evolution. Such a discovery would be profound.
Proving that there is life on another world would surely change this one. The great questions of evolution bring out the best in us: After all, evolution made us who we are.
For those readers who might be deeply religious, welcome. I very much hope you make it through this chapter. I did not mention anything about The Bible.
I had no reference to Jesus from the city of Nazareth.
But I was, and remain, concerned about the extraordinary claim that Earth is extraordinarily young, which is an assault not just on evolution but on the whole public understanding of science. Having a few thousand people make use of a few million dollars to promote their point of view is not unusual.
In the case of teaching evolution in schools, scientists would concede that evolution is a theory, which indeed it is. But there are at least three grave problems with his attempt to broker a treaty on evolution. First, the proposal would be ineffective, for Wade misunderstands the focus of creationist objections to evolution.
How so? The distinction Wade urges is valid, but it is wrong to think that it helps to allay the concerns of creationists about the teaching of evolution. Although creationists have various objections to claims about the paths and the processes of evolution, it is not the details of genuine controversies within evolution, such as kin selection versus group selection, that motivate creationist assaults on the teaching of evolution. Indeed, supporters of the teaching of evolution have no objection in principle to airing such controversies in the public schools, although judiciousness in the selection is required Berbeco et al.
Rather, it is common descent—the big idea of evolution—that is the primary target of creationist attacks on science education. Common descent—especially as it pertains to humans sharing their ancestry with the rest of life—has consistently been at the center of creationist activism, even as the goals have shifted from banning the teaching of evolution, to balancing the teaching of evolution with that of biblical creationism, creation science, or intelligent design, to requiring or encouraging teachers to belittle evolution as scientifically controversial Branch et al.
A sign of the distortion can be detected in his recommendation to distinguish evolution as undeniable fact from evolution as theory. In fact, nothing in science is final, unrevisable, and absolute: putative facts as well as theories are subject to revision in the light of further evidence and theory. To see the problem, consider the question: What would Wade have biology teachers and textbooks do differently? Apparently, he would have them present the fact of evolution—common descent—as inscribed unalterably on stone tablets, final, unrevisable, and absolute.
That is bad advice: they should present it as responsible teachers generally do, as a well-established fact, revisable in principle but in actuality supported by overwhelming evidence.Among the estimated 16 million species on Earth, we alone have the ability to comprehend the process that brought us here.
Actions Shares. Their wings looked like decoration, no more useful than a store-bought bow glued to a gift. Impressions of creatures like trilobites that lived in the more distant past are found in the lowermost layers. Researchers figured out where it would have lived. Through his far-flung geographic and intellectual explorations, Wallace formulated his theory of evolution independent of Darwin, and described an important aspect of the evolutionary process, often still referred to as the Wallace effect more about that in chapter Somehow, the bees were able to get in there, fill their pollen baskets from the flowers, and fly away again and again.
No, cancel Yes, report it Thanks! What happens to other species also happens to us.